July 6, 2009
When I first applied to medical school, I had never heard of osteopathic medicine. To me, a physician was someone who went to medical school and got an M.D. degree. During my year as an EMT, I even called on a hospital that employs one osteopathic physician (D.O.) for every allopathic physician (M.D.), and I never knew that there was a difference. When I shadowed a few doctors at my local hospitals, even those who knew an osteopathic physician couldn’t tell me what that difference was. Both D.O.s and M.D.s are fully qualified physicians licensed to prescribe medication and perform surgery in the United States. In fact, there are quite a few ways in which osteopaths and allopaths are alike. Here’s a short list, courtesy of the American Osteopathic Association:
- Applicants to both D.O. and M.D. medical colleges typically have 4-year undergraduate degrees with an emphasis on scientific courses.
- Both D.O.s and M.D.s complete 4 years of basic medical education.
- After medical school, both D.O.s and M.D.s obtain graduate medical education through programs like internships and residencies that last 3-6 years.
- D.O.s and M.D.s must pass comparable examinations to obtain state licenses.
So, what’s the difference? To answer that question, let’s take a quick look at the history of osteopathic medicine and how it came to be.
History
Osteopathic medicine was founded in 1874 by Andrew Taylor Still, M.D. Still’s medical training, like most physicians of his time, came through apprenticeship. He was fascinated by human anatomy and believed that most of our diseases had some kind of somatic component. He was dissatsifed with the health care of his day and believed that a system based on medicines and drugs was potentially more harmful than helpful. In 1892, Still opened the American School of Osteopathy in Kirksville, MO, and began training students with an emphasis on the musculoskeletal system. In the century since osteopathic medicine began, the scope of practice has grown to include traditional allopathic medicine while still retaining its emphasis on the musculoskeletal system and the body’s innate ability to heal itself.
Principles
There are a few basic principles of osteopathic medicine that form the basis for every patient encounter, physical exam, diagnosis, and treatment regimen. They are:
- The body is a unit.
- Structure and function are reciprocally related.
- The body possesses self-regulatory mechanisms.
- The body has the inherent capacity to defend itself and to repair itself.
- When normal adaptability is disrupted, or when environmental changes overcome the body’s capacity for self-maintenance, disease may ensue.
- Rational treatment is based on the previous principles.
- Movement of body fluids is essential to the maintenance of health.
- The nerves play a crucial part of controlling fluids in the body.
- There are somatic components to disease that are not only manifestations of disease but also are factors that contribute to maintenance of the diseased state.
The D.O. Difference
As previously mentioned, both D.O.s and M.D.s are fully licensed to practice medicine in the United States. Approximately 65% of practicing osteopathic physicians, however, specialize in primary care areas like pediatrics, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, and internal medicine. D.O.s also bring something extra to medicine:
- Osteopathic medical schools emphasize training students to be primary care physicians.
- D.O.s practice a “whole person” approach to medicine. Instead of just treating specific symptoms or illnesses, they regard your body as an integrated whole.
- Osteopathic physicians focus on preventive health care.
- D.O.s receive extra training in the musculoskeletal system-your body’s interconnected system of nerves, muscles and bones that make up two-thirds of your body mass. This training provides osteopathic physicians with a better understanding of the ways that an illness or injury in one part of your body can affect another.
- Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is incorporated into the training and practice of osteopathic physicians. With OMT, osteopathic physicians use their hands to diagnose illness and injury and to encourage your body’s natural tendency toward good health. By combining all other available medical options with OMT, D.O.s offer their patients the most comprehensive care available in medicine today.
The above passage is available on the AOA’s website. I’d like to draw special attention to the bolded item, because it is the single most important factor in my decision to pursue a D.O. degree. In a medical system where patients are more often referred to by their disease instead of their names and emotional attachment to patients is so heavily frowned upon, a school of thought that places the patient on a higher pedestal than their disease is refreshing. It’s what every physician, osteopathic or allopathic, should strive for.
4 Comments |
Medicine | Tagged: aoa |
Permalink
Posted by brianfishman
July 3, 2009
My reviews for the Wii and DS versions of Puzzle Kingdoms were posted to GameSpot a few days ago. They’re essentially the same game, save for the graphical differences. Puzzle Quest is still Infinite Interactive’s best title, but Puzzle Kingdoms is a decent time suck for people (like myself) who were massively disappointed with Puzzle Quest: Galactrix.
Last night, my review of Rocket Riot on Xbox Live Arcade went live. It’s the best downloadable game I’ve played in a long time. If you have a few friends over, the competitive multiplayer is frantic and addicting.
Up next I’ll be reviewing Mega Man StarForce 3. Honestly, I’m not sure why I still play these games. The mechanics are solid, but they haven’t changed since the original game years ago. The visuals are straight out of the Game Boy Advance era and the inane story serves no other purpose than creating a string of events to drag Mega Man to the next location. Oh well. It’s still addicting.
Leave a Comment » |
Reviews, Video Games |
Permalink
Posted by brianfishman
July 2, 2009
I was recently contacted by a representative of the American Osteopathic Association who thought I might be interested in the AOA’s upcoming business and policy meeting. Representatives of the nation’s more than 67,000 osteopathic physicians (D.O.s) will convene July 17-18 for the AOA’s Annual House of Delegates Meeting in Chicago, IL. Delegates representing osteopathic state medical associations, specialty societies, interns, residents, and students will vote on organizational policies surrounding a variety of health care issues, such as prohibiting the advertisement and sale of raw milk and the recommendation that physically active video games could be considered as a component of a patient’s fitness routine.
Here is an excerpt from the pre-meeting news release about the video games resolution:
Physically Active Video Games: After years of being blamed for contributing to America’s childhood obesity problem, many video games are now incorporating a fitness component, such as exercising with a virtual trainer or following a dance routine. Delegates will vote on whether physicians should consider recommending physically active video games as an element of a patient’s exercise program. The policy also would direct the AOA to encourage additional research about the health benefits of using physically active video games as part of both an exercise routine and a patient’s rehabilitation.
As a medical student considering pediatrics as a career and as an avid video game player for over 20 years, I can’t help but be excited about the potential for mutual benefit here. Patients have a hard time committing to long-term fitness goals because it’s difficult to stay motivated when your exercise routine isn’t particularly stimulating. And video games have long been one of the many scapegoats for America’s childhood obesity epidemic. I am certainly guilty of blaming a lack of physical activity on a video game once or twice myself. But with new titles like Wii Fit and EA Sports Active introducing what seems to be a lasting trend of fitness-focused video games, the potential benefits to health care can’t be overlooked. I’ll be following developments on this front closely.
About D.O.s and Osteopathic Medicine
- What is a D.O.? – Information about the differences and similarities in training between an osteopathic physician (D.O.) and an M.D.
- Osteopathic Medical Profession Report – Statistical information about the osteopathic medical profession.
- Style Guide – Proper terminology and guidelines for referring to D.O.s and osteopathic medicine.
Leave a Comment » |
Medicine, Politics, Video Games | Tagged: aoa, ea sports active, wii fit |
Permalink
Posted by brianfishman
May 28, 2009
Now that my first year of medical school is over (more on that later), I’m finding myself with absolutely no responsibility and plenty of free time. I decided to go back and catch up on a bunch of games I’d tried out a while ago and then never finished.
Starting with the game highest on my pile of shame this console generation, I restarted and finished Bioshock. What a great game. I only have two complaints. The audio diaries were an innovative way to tell Bioshock’s narrative, but the garbled sound effects and combat craziness made it really difficult to understand what they were saying sometimes. Also, the plasmids were a lot of fun to use, but there were almost too many to choose from. I never used the bee plasmid, and I actually played through the majority of the game (except the final chapters) by shocking enemies and then running up to them with the wrench. Other than that, I loved it. I can’t wait for the sequel.
Then I turned my attention to Too Human. I’d read all of the reviews and knew exactly what to expect going into the game, but I figured I should really see what a game that’s been in development for 10 years looked like. Prey didn’t turn out too bad. How much worse could Too Human be? That game is an exercise in tedium. The story is almost incomprehensible due to a complete lack of exposition, the combat is mindless, death is inevitable (so much so that they gave me 5 achievement points for my 100th dirt nap), and that infuriating death sequence is one of the most unfathomable design decisions I’ve ever seen. I don’t think I’ll ever play Too Human again.
Finally, I picked up Assassin’s Creed again. I love that game. I can understand how its repetitive nature was a divisive point for a lot of people, but I really enjoyed it. I was very invested in the story and I think the presentation values were impressive (even the altered Ubisoft logo at the startup screen was a nice touch). Assassin’s Creed 2 will be a day-one purchase for me.
I’ve started playing Lost Planet again, and when I’m done with that I’ll probably give Mass Effect another shot. I want to get through the games that have sequels coming out so that I’m all caught up. In unrelated news, this may be the first year that I miss E3. The conference starts on my birthday when my dad and I will be heading out to a Porsche racetrack to get some free racing lessons. Then on June 3rd I’ll be heading to Niagara Falls for a few days with my fiancee. I love having nothing to do!
Leave a Comment » |
Impressions, Video Games | Tagged: assassin's creed, bioshock, e3, lost planet, mass effect, too human |
Permalink
Posted by brianfishman